Chapter 4 of 5

Chapter 4: Structural Barriers and Opportunities

Structural realities related to money, work/family responsibilities, white and male dominance, and party strength and influence offer both persistent barriers and opportunities for increasing women’s political power.

Pennsylvania Story

No woman served in Pennsylvania’s 20-member congressional delegation from January 2015 to November 2018. But four women from the Commonwealth – Madeleine Dean, Chrissy Houlahan, Mary Gay Scanlon, and Susan Wild – won U.S. House seats in 2018, joining a record number of Democratic women who won House seats nationally that year. All likely benefited from the energy among and for women in that election, but state-specific factors also played a role in both their  opportunities and success.

No woman served in Pennsylvania’s 20-member congressional delegation from January 2015 to November 2018. But four women from the Commonwealth – Madeleine Dean, Chrissy Houlahan, Mary Gay Scanlon, and Susan Wild – won U.S. House seats in 2018, joining a record number of Democratic women who won House seats nationally that year. All likely benefited from the energy among and for women in that election, but state-specific factors also played a role in both their  opportunities and success.

In January 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the 2011 U.S. congressional redistricting map violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. The Court ruled that the original map, which had been approved by the Republican-majority state legislature and signed into law by a Republican governor, was a partisan gerrymander that unfairly favored Republicans. In February 2018, the Court issued a new map for use in the 2018 cycle after the legislature failed to pass their own plan to remedy the gerrymander. The new map was more favorable to Democrats and contributed to a net gain of three Democratic seats in the then 18-member U.S. House delegation. All four non-incumbent Democratic wins were by women and women were responsible for three of four congressional seats picked up by Democrats in 2018.

U.S. Representative Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA) refuted the notion that the redrawing of Pennsylvania’s congressional maps was a “necessary condition” for women’s success in 2018, telling us, “I think I was going to win no matter what, and I don’t think it has to do with the map.” Likewise, U.S. Representative Susan Wild (D-PA) reminded us that she launched her campaign before the new maps came out and felt that she benefited from voters’ desire for women’s representation and frustration with career politicians. Both Wild and Scanlon also won under both new and old district lines due to simultaneous special elections, suggesting that their success – to Houlahan’s point – cannot be solely attributed to redistricting. Incumbent retirements also mattered in multiple contests, including retirements likely influenced by factors other than new district lines. Still, the new congressional map was at least among the factors contributing to Democratic women’s success in Pennsylvania’s 2018 congressional contests, evidencing the importance of pairing a structural opportunity with women’s willingness and preparedness to run.

Despite the success of these women, Pennsylvania women still face a glass ceiling at the U.S. Senate and gubernatorial levels. Moreover, only 9 women – and no women of color – have ever held any of the state’s five statewide elective executive offices. Asked about this dearth in representation, insiders pointed to both structural and political hurdles to women candidates’ emergence and success. Money weighed heavily in their assessments of the structural barriers to women breaking through at these levels of office. In a state as large as Pennsylvania, with multiple major media markets and partisan competitiveness, the financial cost of waging and winning a statewide campaign is especially high for anyone. When former U.S. Representative Allyson Schwartz and Katie McGinty ran for the Democratic nomination to be governor in 2014, they were significantly outspent by Tom Wolf, who invested about $10 million of his own money in the primary contest. Nationwide, women are less likely to self-fund their political campaigns.

But self-funding is not a requirement for statewide success. Buy-in from donors is essential, and is something that Pennsylvania political professionals told us is still affected by gender biases in perceptions of electability and male-dominated donor networks. Democratic political consultant and former executive director of the Democratic Party, Jason Robert Henry, explained, “Unless you have a lot of money to be able to get known around the state, [major donors are] gonna go with the folks who they know, and I think this is where kind of the old boys’ club comes in.” Dana Brown, executive director of the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics, described the “conservatism” – not used in an ideological sense – that contributes to electability bias against women and candidates who have not previously won statewide. “While I believe that the political parties are doing what they believe best to diversify their parties,” she said, “I  think [the whole political ecosystem does] suffer from…this belief that the Pennsylvania voters at large are more conservative and, therefore, have certain expectations about what a statewide executive candidate may sound like, look like, believe in.” She added more directly, “[There are] just some implicit biases that are coming out in how donors [and] parties are perceiving who’s electable and who’s not and for what reasons are they electable and not.” In addition to gender, race and geography are factors in electability perceptions, with more traditional stakeholders believing that women, people of color, and those from the southeast will be perceived as too liberal in the rest of the state. The success of women in recent statewide judicial contests challenges these electability biases and might, according to those we interviewed, help to bolster the case for backing women candidates in future statewide executive and U.S. Senate contests.

The white, male dominance of party stakeholders – and party aversion to “outsiders” – is more acute in certain parts of the state. In our interviews, officeholders and practitioners in northwest Pennsylvania described explicit gatekeeping by male party leaders at the county level. And in the southwest, the decision of the Allegheny County Democratic Committee not to endorse multiple incumbent women officeholders in recent cycles raised questions about the degree to which partisan gatekeeping was a function of both gender and race. While one state party leader argued that the county party’s decisions were more about ideological differences and party insiders’ unwillingness to give support without more active courting by the candidates, the relationship between institutional disruption, outsider status, and race and gender within ecosystems long dominated by white men cannot be fully untangled. When we interviewed her in June 2022, U.S. Representative Summer Lee (D-PA) – who won both her state legislative and congressional contests without the backing of the Allegheny County Democratic Committee – described the organization as a deterrent to newcomers, including those who might better represent the communities they serve. The success of these Democratic women in spite of their county party organization reflects not only their ability to utilize alternative sites for building political power but also the declining importance of party organizations as determinative to candidate success.

Apart from party opposition, Lee shared with us another structural hurdle on her path to elective office — the personal financial costs of candidacy. Describing her first campaign for the state legislature in 2018, she explained, “I was living with my mom who allowed me to go and do this, who said, ‘I see the potential here…and I recognize that you won’t pay rent and that you won’t be able to contribute but I think that this is an investment in your future.’” Lee added, “There are so many Black girls who aren’t able to make long-term investments in their future because they have to make short-term decisions for their livelihood.” Her experience and reflection serve as reminders of how the financial costs of full-time campaigning are exacerbated by lost income and amplified for individuals and communities with less access to generational wealth.

In 2023, Lee became the first Black woman to represent Pennsylvania in Congress, joining the four other women first elected in 2018. At the same time, her former state legislative colleague Joanna McClinton became the first woman and first Black woman to serve as speaker of the Pennsylvania House. At age 40, McClinton also bucked age and seniority norms when she took the gavel. In November 2023, Cherelle Parker, a former state representative and a member of the Philadelphia City Council, became the first Black woman elected as mayor of Philadelphia. These women have overcome structural hurdles – as well as social and political hurdles (see chapter five) – at the intersection of race and gender en route to political power. But they have also created opportunities to counteract, and even remove, these hurdles. For example, after her success in 2018, Representative Lee launched her own political action committee – UNITE PAC – to support non-traditional candidates financially and connect them to networks that can counter the dominant influence of large donors and party gatekeepers. While not focused on women alone, Lee’s PAC first demonstrated its influence in backing three successful women candidates for local-level offices in Allegheny County in 2019. Lee’s commitment to building a political power base in her own county that is more representative at the intersections of race, class, gender, and ideology is reflective of the value of women’s political leadership in addressing structural barriers to women’s political power.

Read The Story
  • Financial Challenges to Candidates

    Financial challenges, including the cost of campaigns, unequal access to monied networks, and gender disparities in political giving, are frequently cited hurdles to women running for public office and waging a successful campaign.

  • Financial Challenges to Officeholders and Practitioners

    Financial challenges, including low salaries and the opportunity cost of public service over private sector employment, are frequently cited as hurdles to women holding public office. These challenges extend to some unelected political roles (e.g. staff).

  • Work/Family Conflicts in Campaigns and Government

    Work/family conflicts – including difficult timelines of legislative sessions, lengthy campaigns with high time demands, and geographic distance between home and governing institutions – create challenges to candidacy, officeholding, and unelected political positions for women in both campaigns and government. But structural changes in rules and procedures, often championed by women political leaders, create opportunities to better address/resolve these conflicts and enhance accessibility.

  • Political Party Influence

    Political parties remain an influential force in shaping structural opportunities for women in politics despite challenges to party organizations’ strength and unity. Party organizations, leaders, and institutional control influence recruitment, resources, and representation in ways that shape women’s access to and exercise of political power.

  • Vacancies and Appointments

    Maximizing structural opportunities created by elective office vacancies or appointments left to the discretion of elected political leaders requires intentionality in building a diverse bench of political women, prioritizing diversity in both the facilitators and the beneficiaries of recruitment and selection, and engaging in succession planning.

  • Changes in Electorates

    Changes in electorates created by demographic change, redistricting processes, and voter mobilization or suppression efforts create opportunities and hurdles for increasing women’s political representation and power, especially at intersections of race and gender.

  • Institutional Power Distribution

    Structural power within political institutions is still disproportionately held by white men, but increased participation and success of women and actions by male allies create opportunities for structural change in access and outcomes.

  • Prescriptions for Addressing Structural Barriers and Opportunities


The final two chapters of this report address structural, social, and political barriers and opportunities to increasing women’s political power, with this chapter focusing on structural forces shaping women’s political power. This section builds on, without repeating, chapter three’s focus on support infrastructure for women in politics, which is a central structural factor influencing women’s political opportunities. The structural, social, and political factors outlined in chapters four and five are not easily distinguishable. They function simultaneously and interact with each other within state political ecosystems to create distinct conditions for women at specific intersections of race, class, party, geography, and gender, among other axes of identity and situatedness. Finally, both chapters draw primarily from two questions posed to our interview subjects. We first asked political insiders what factors have contributed to gains in women’s political representation in their states over the past decade, and then we asked what barriers remain that contribute to women’s political underrepresentation. For both questions, we probed on differences by party, race/ethnicity, level of office, and/or type of political role (e.g. officeholder, political practitioner, activist, or organization leader).


Financial Challenges to Candidates

Financial challenges, including the cost of campaigns, unequal access to monied networks, and gender disparities in political giving, are frequently cited hurdles to women running for public office and waging a successful campaign.

The cost of waging successful political campaigns varies widely by level of office as well as by state. While the height of this hurdle varies by campaign type and site, almost all political insiders we interviewed – across state, party, and role – cited money among the barriers to increasing women’s political power. Recent research from the Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP) illustrates that while men and women candidates ultimately raise similar amounts of money in comparable state legislative and statewide executive contests, men give a disproportionate amount of all campaign contributions. Additionally, women candidates are often more likely than men to rely on small-dollar contributions and less likely than men to fund their own campaigns. And while women donors give disproportionately to women candidates in both parties, women donors are especially likely to give to Democratic women candidates, creating an opportune site for growth. Interview subjects in Georgia, Illinois, Nevada, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania echoed these trends as shaping the financial landscape for women in their states, as well as giving additional attention to racial/ethnic and class differences in access to the networks and capital necessary to successfully wage political campaigns, especially at the highest levels of political office. They also pointed to campaign costs that are not covered by fundraising, including the more personal costs of taking leave from paid employment and/or paying for additional childcare to campaign. While some interview subjects suggested reforms to limit the role of money in campaigns and/or provide public financing to candidates, many emphasized strategies – such as increasing financial support to women candidates earlier in campaigns and expanding permissions to use campaign funds to cover personal costs – to help women navigate the financial landscape as it is today.

I’m a regular middle-class person. I didn’t have the luxury of mortgaging my future. I didn’t have a home that I could put up for collateral to run this race, right? I was working full-time when I launched my campaign. …The only reason I could run is because I didn’t have student loans. That was one thing that was maybe a separator from me [and] my peer groups but I am not wealthy [and] well-connected.”

Lauren Underwood (d-il)

U.S. Representative

I’ve realized that this is something that’s going on nationwide, that if you want to be governor that often comes hand-in-hand with enormous wealth. I’m not enormously wealthy. …I never considered being governor because I just didn’t feel like I could come up with the dollars that were necessary. Not that I couldn’t do [the job of being governor], alright. You put me in the seat [and] I’ll work hard. I could do it. But I just don’t think that I could accumulate that sort of wealth.”

Evelyn Sanguinetti (r-il)

Former Lieutenant Governor

It takes more effort to get a woman to run for office because we’re overwhelmed and worried about finances. I mean, it was the first thing I brought up. I was like, ‘I can’t put a dime to my campaign, so how are we doing to do this?’”

Cyndi Munson (d-ok)

State House Minority Leader

Another barrier that these women [candidates], especially women of color [candidates], are coming up against is a lot of them don’t come from historical wealth, don’t come from generational wealth, [and] have families [that] can’t be contributing all of the time.”

Chelsey Branham (d-ok)

Former State Representative

In a way…the most hard-fought races in the city of Chicago are aldermanic races. And because it’s harder for women to raise money and because women are less likely to be in professions where they have rich friends, it’s harder for women to have the financial foundation that they need to run for these offices. It’s still true that for any of us in public life [that] most of our financial supporters are men. And particularly for those local offices, it makes it harder for women [candidates].”

Toni Preckwinkle (d-il)

President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners

I think one [of the barriers to women’s political representation is] access to resources. Being able to fund campaigns, especially the way they’re being financed today when you have independent expenditures flying in, and it’s just getting more expensive to run for elected office. And again, when we’re talking about women being paid less, that means women have access to less resources, access to less assets. And it just kind of immediately creates a barrier for our ability to raise our own capital to finance campaigns.”

Morgan Cephas (d-pa)

State Representative

Money is the commodity that people use to judge [electability]. …Candidates always have to prove themselves…male and female. And when you go out there and you say you want to run then part of the way you prove yourself is to get endorsements and part of [doing that] is [showing] how much money [you raised].”

Christine Jacobs (d-pa)

Executive Director of Represent PA

Donors want to invest in people that they think are going to win. And donors don’t think women are going to win. …And so I think that is the biggest obstacle facing women, facing every candidate, really facing women is how do they convince the donor base that they can win.”

Kalyn Free (d-ok)

Democratic National Committeewoman and Political Consultant

Women have to write checks. …When I put together donor call sheets for my clients, there [are] three women, maybe four, in my top 150 donors. And if you want to grow influence, all money is is access. It’s access and influence. It is not quid pro quo. It’s not any of that. It’s to open a door. And women are not giving. …Women have got to give, and that’s how they are going to start to get into these circles and start to break through. …If you want to affect political change and gain influence, it’s writing checks.”

Jenna Worthen (r-ok)

Treasurer of the PowHER PAC and Republican Political Consultant

Over and over, we see who controls the campaign dollars and who gives the campaign dollars is often men. I talk a lot about how in my household before I got elected – maybe even still a little bit now – my husband made all of the decisions about who we gave to politically and I made all the charitable decisions, right? And…so if I left that to him then does that mean he’s choosing mostly men? I mean I don’t think so. We kind of share some of those values, but in some households it may mean that, right?”

Donna Bullock (d-pa)

State Representative

I would be lying if I told you there probably isn’t some slight bias with women [candidates] among [the donor class]. If the donor class is 80% male, then it’s not surprising we keep ending up with male candidates.”

Ray Zaborney (r-pa)

Republican Political Consultant

Financial Challenges to Officeholders and Practitioners

Financial challenges, including low salaries and the opportunity cost of public service over private sector employment, are frequently cited as hurdles to women holding public office. These challenges extend to some unelected political roles (e.g. staff).

The challenging economics of political service are not limited to candidacy. They persist into officeholding, in addition to affecting those – especially staff – who make politics their full-time profession. Most notable is the low pay, considering the expectations and opportunity costs of service, and its impact on both women’s incentive to serve and retention as officeholders and staff. Compensation is not only a hurdle for women, but women’s heightened economic vulnerability makes it more resonant. And this is especially true for women situated at the nexus of multiple axes of economic vulnerability due to class, age, race, or other factors. As is evident at the state legislative level, officeholder pay and legislative time commitments vary significantly across states, including among our case states for this project. Pay also varies significantly at local levels of office. For example, members of Nevada’s Clark County Commission make almost ten times more than a Nevada state legislator; differences in formal time commitments contribute to, but do not wholly account for, pay disparities. Members of the Philadelphia City Council also make more than members of Pennsylvania’s full-time state legislature. In contrast, members of the Norman, Oklahoma city council make $100 a month while Oklahoma state legislators’ annual salary amounts to about $4,000 monthly. These realities, combined with the time and geographic demands outlined in the next section, influence women’s interest and capacity to take on political roles, especially in relation to other professional and personal responsibilities.

There’s a reason why wealthy people who often are men and not responsible for childcare are the ones who often run for office. …Oftentimes when people are considering running, they are not seriously considering the personal ecology that they are going to need to maintain in order to be successful as an elected official. Thinking about running for state House in Georgia, if you are a millionaire and you have assets and you have childcare and all of that, you absolutely can go work for $17,000 a year. Of course, right? You cannot do that if you are working class, if you are actively involved in rearing children, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And so what kind of life do you need, what kind of support do you need in order to sustain a career as an elected official? And even on the federal level, you need support in ways that wealth makes easier [and] gives you access to.”

Nsé Ufot (np-ga)

Former Chief Executive Officer of the New Georgia Project

I would say the two pivotal [reasons that I left the legislature] were our youngest daughter was getting ready to go to college and our promise was to pay for their college so they could come out debt free. And financially in our state we only get paid $8,000 every two years. And so I had taken all my savings from my corporate [job] that I had accumulated in the almost 20 years at MGM and that’s what I lived off of so I could be a full-time legislator. But with no pay, right, so I used all my savings to be able to do that. And then obviously that has an end point, it wasn’t endless. And when our daughter made the decision that…she wanted to go to college then we had to relook at our finances and it just wasn’t penciling out.”

Irene Bustamante Adams (d-nv)

Former Speaker Pro Tempore of the State Assembly

Especially for state government workers, the pay that you’re going to get [in the Illinois legislature] versus the pay that you would get working in the private sector, especially if you’re a young female or a young minority coming out of law school, [is significantly different]. [Do] you really…want to come down to Springfield and work for not very much money, have to travel, all that, or [if] you can just work for a law firm in Chicago, what are you gonna do?”

Jessica Basham (d-il)

Former Chief of Staff to House Speakers Michael Madigan and Emanuel Chris Welch

I have been very lucky that [with] the work that I’ve done as a lawyer, I was able to nestle away enough money to survive for not practicing law for two years. Who can quit their job for two years to run for office? I mean, that’s crazy. Like saying it out loud is just ridiculous. But, you know, but that’s how I feel about the last five years [of running for and serving in office]. I really do feel like it was my tour of duty. [Interview conducted in February 2023.]”

Jen Jordan (d-ga)

Former State Senator

One of the things that also happened to me, as I was running [for city council] was…the television station [I worked for] sent it all the way up to the corporate office and I had to resign from doing that work to run. And then the day after I was elected, my radio job let me go. …So that was my introduction to really being elected. You’re going to pay the cost and I paid the ultimate sacrifice because I remember telling my mother, I said, ‘You know, mom, I did not expect to have to worry about my community and myself. Now I have to worry about me and figure out how I’m going to survive on $12,000 a year. How am I going to pay rent? And do the things that I need to do in order to make my community successful without being selfishly worried about myself?’”

Nikki Nice (d-ok)

Oklahoma City Councilmember

One of the other barriers that I saw in running [for office], talking about the economic status and all of that, was the financial aspect of running. So…legislators only make $45,000 a year. …With my husband working for the state, I have always been the breadwinner in our family and so that was something that was really scary to me. …I knew that we would be taking a substantial pay cut [from] me quitting my job and going to run for office. …I remember telling my boss, ‘I can’t run for office because I can’t afford to do that.’ …My boss allowed me to keep my job. And so I worked for him nine months out of the year…and…then the other I just kind of pieced together what I [could] do for him during that time [the legislature was in session]. And so the flexibility that he allows and still paying me was able to break that barrier [to officeholding] down but a lot of people can’t do that.”

Jessica Garvin (r-ok)

State Senator

Work/Family Conflicts in Campaigns and Government

Work/family conflicts – including difficult timelines of legislative sessions, lengthy campaigns with high time demands, and geographic distance between home and governing institutions – create challenges to candidacy, officeholding, and unelected political positions for women in both campaigns and government. But structural changes in rules and procedures, often championed by women political leaders, create opportunities to better address/resolve these conflicts and enhance accessibility. 

The often-conflicting demands of professional and domestic responsibilities have been historically cited as hurdles to women’s willingness and ability to serve in public office. While some research has shown minimal effects of motherhood and marriage on women’s political ambition, other research has demonstrated the outsized influence of familial (and other) relationships and economics on women’s decision to run for office. In our interviews, political actors across states frequently cited persistent challenges related to navigating work and family as shaping women’s political opportunities and advancement in elected and unelected positions. These challenges are exacerbated by time, geographic, and financial demands that vary by political institution and profession. Many interview subjects noted that men also face work/family conflicts associated with political roles, but most suggested that these conflicts remain heightened for women who, despite notable societal progress, continue to bear the brunt of caregiving responsibilities. Work/family conflicts are not unique to members of any party, but conservative interview subjects were slightly more likely than others to cite domestic responsibilities of women as shaping political ambition or capacity. Efforts to address work/family conflicts through structural changes are evident, though limited, across state political ecosystems we investigated. These include more site-specific policies to promote family-friendliness and widespread, formalized efforts to create supports for caregivers engaged in campaigns.

The hardest thing to overcome has been getting good women to run. …The risks feel so high, particularly for mothers. Because it is no joke, it is a grueling pace and it requires a lot of time away from your family. And some women have very helpful, intuitive partners, and some women, they feel like things are going to fall apart if they are not around. True or untrue, that’s for them to kind of flush out.”

Jenna Worthen (r-ok)

Treasurer of the PowHER PAC and Republican Political Consultant

When you run for office, one of the biggest barriers I think for women to even step up is family, right? And so we think about, should I run? I have small children. That’s a really massive consideration. Whereas you think a guy for ten seconds gives it more than that thought of whether or not they should run for office because of how it would impact their family? The expectation is, ‘My wife is going to pick up that slack and she’s going to be okay with that,’ right? It’s not like, ‘I’m going to be away from my kids, not going to get to see them every night. How’s that going to impact them?’ These feelings of massive guilt that come with stepping up for office – I felt it even though I talk about how important it is to not be that way. I mean, I’m human, right? I’m a mother.”

Susana Mendoza (d-il)

State Comptroller

The way in which we do the [political] work is centered around humans that aren’t responsible for other humans. Meaning I’m a mother, I have three children. I have a 13, 11, and eight year-old. And I was a mother of two when I started this work…and then I had my third child on the job. …If I didn’t have my family and the women in my family, there’s no way in the world that I would be here because it would have been impossible. I couldn’t have afforded childcare because it would have been cost prohibitive even for me. I wouldn’t have been able to travel. I wouldn’t have been able to concentrate on learning the job. …My aunt didn’t just take care of my children. She made sure that my family was intact, and that’s an important component that’s never really explored which is why you don’t always see us in these spaces [of political leadership] because why would you? There’s nothing to support us being in these spaces as people who have more accountability and responsibility.”

Stacy Davis Gates (d-il)

President of the Chicago Teachers Union

On the staff side, these are jobs where you’re working 40, 50, 60 hours a week. You can’t do that with two kids at home. You can’t necessarily do that. And you can’t travel from Chicago to Springfield every week for six months a year. So these [legislative staff positions] become jobs that are mostly held by younger women who don’t have children and then they end up getting married or they end up having children and then they leave the job and go do something else. …Our state Capitol doesn’t have a daycare. That’s crazy, right? …We didn’t have a lactation room until I came back from maternity leave and bitched about the fact that I had nowhere to pump. …It’s hard to build that bench [of women staffers]…if you don’t have the institutional support to help you do those kinds of things.”

Heather Wier Vaught (d-il)

Democratic Lobbyist and Consultant and Former Chief Counsel to Speaker Michael Madigan

I was the first commissioner at my Metropolitan Water Reclamation Board in 130 years to have a baby while in office. I didn’t know that when I had the baby. I found that out as I had to navigate certain things. And they were like, ‘We’ve never dealt with this before,’ so even things like maternity leave, they were like, ‘We don’t know because we’re technically part-time employees so we’re not FMLA eligible.’ …I didn’t know if I was getting paid until they paid me.”

Josina Morita (d-il)

Cook County Commissioner and Former Commissioner of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District

I carried this childcare bill in the Senate. [Representative] Jehan [Gordon-Booth] had it in the House. We tag-teamed this. We negotiated together. It was intense and hard and all the rest of that stuff. And her daughter, Jianna, …was maybe three. And so we had her in the capitol. And so here I am babysitting Jianna in the Senate chamber because her mother is running a childcare bill and doesn’t have childcare. There’s no daycare center in the capitol. …There are close places, [but]…does it make it easy for young women who are having babies to actually hold office?”

Toi W. Hutchinson (d-il)

Former State Senator

When I finally said, ‘Yes, I’m going to [run for office],’ I also told my [staff], ‘I need you all to remember that I’m a mother. I need you all to remember that I need time with my child. So we are going to have to figure out a childcare situation that includes my child into all of this because I can’t just not see my child. That’s not an option.’ And because of that we created a kid’s area in our campaign office and we had childcare every weekend when we were knocking on doors so that when I came back for lunch I could be with my child. And for other women that wanted to participate in the campaign [and]…be able to leave their kids in childcare — they could go knock on doors and organize or participate in the campaign in whatever way they wanted to. That experience…informs the way in which I structure my ward office because when you come into my ward office the first thing that you have is the kid’s area where, when parents come in with their kids, they know that there’s space for them.”

Rossana Rodríguez (d-il)

Chicago City Councilmember

One thing we started doing at our office is we have a kid’s room. And so employees can bring their kids to the office if they need to. And [there are] lots of toys there. There’s TV, Disney Plus, books and that, right? But I’ve been working in this [advocacy] space for quite some time and never did have a manager sit here and say, ‘Well, okay you have kids. How can I, as your manager, help you be the best version of yourself professionally but also personally?’ And I think being a woman and being a mom has made me think about that a lot.”

Emily Persaud-Zamora (np-nv)

Executive Director of Silver State Voices

Political Party Influence

Political parties remain an influential force in shaping structural opportunities for women in politics despite challenges to party organizations’ strength and unity. Party organizations, leaders, and institutional control influence recruitment, resources, and representation in ways that shape women’s access to and exercise of political power.

We asked interview subjects if they perceived political parties as impediments or facilitators to women in politics in their state. Answers varied significantly by interview subject’s party identification, geographic location, and who they designated as the “party” — whether state or local party organizations, elected party leaders, or unelected party influencers (e.g. donors, former elected officials). As noted in chapter one, weak party organizations reduce their ability to serve as either impediment or facilitator to women. And party control, within and across governmental institutions, also shapes opportunities for women to attain and exercise political influence based on their party affiliation. Finally, as outlined in chapter three, Democrats and Republicans navigate different value systems and electoral incentive structures for promoting women’s political representation and power. Some political insiders cited opportunities to reduce partisan influence, especially for partisan-minority officeholders in supermajority states, by seeking power at the local level. Another approach is to increase women’s political power within party structures by disrupting the white, male dominance among party leaders and operatives.

I see [the Allegheny County Party Democratic Committee] as becoming, in too many instances, kind of a gatekeeping organization. …It’s become this really incestuous club where people who had been able to amass some sort of influence – I don’t even like to always call it power, but an influence or a proximity to power – they are able to use it to control the politics of their very hyper-localized communities. And the problem with that is that what it does is it ends up perpetuating this kind of phenomenon where our elected officials don’t always reflect their communities. …The people who have the relationships with those committees, who have those pre-existing networks, what they do is they use them to shut out newcomers, to shut out new blood. And they convince newcomers that this is an endeavor that they shouldn’t take up because you’ll be shunned or you will be curb-stomped. But it’s a deterrent. It had served as a deterrent for so long, and then we came and ran, seeing that for exactly what is was, and just making a plan to go around it. And what we were able to do is really lay bare their shortcomings, some of their blind spots, and also some of their weaknesses. And [we were] able to build an apparatus or build infrastructure to counteract it.”

Summer Lee (d-pa)

U.S. Representative

From what I have seen the candidates that do well have been people that have been volunteering or supporting campaigns or been involved in these party spaces for many years. But then it makes it harder for people that haven’t done that level of party-affiliated work to be successful. And I’ve seen…so many times where we have a candidate that is a very authentic advocate for her community. She’s a woman of color, grew up in the district wanting to run for office and is in a primary against a white man who has been in the Democratic Party for ten years, serves as a leader in the party and, of course, he’s going to win that primary because no one knows this woman even though she’s a more authentic representative of the district, right? No one knows who she is. She can’t raise the money. She can’t get through the fray of election season. And so, of course, we end up with people who lose because they don’t have the notoriety of being through the party. So I think our vision [at Asian American Advocacy Fund] is very much [to] try to identify and cultivate more of those people that are those authentic representatives of their communities and give them a chance to actually fight in those sorts of situations where they may be fighting a party person for a primary.”

Aisha Yaqoob Mahmood (d-ga)

Executive Director of Asian American Advocacy Fund

I’ve been in the Senate for 12 years and have become one of the highest-ranking Republican women within the state. Throughout that entire time, we’ve talked about what needs to be done to get more women into the party. My female colleagues and I have articulated suggestions to accomplish that goal. However, it can be frustrating at times to see the pace at which real positive change happens. [Interview conducted in May 2022.]”

Sue Rezin (r-il)

State Senator

[Assembly Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick] had a vision to make sure women had a place at the table. And so she made sure that we, the women that had gotten elected, had leadership positions. And so that’s how we ended up chairing committees and holding leadership roles in such a small amount of time because she was pivotal. And now we have a majority-woman legislature and she was part of that cornerstone that made it happen.”

Irene Bustamante Adams (d-nv)

Former Speaker Pro Tempore of the State Assembly

So certainly I bring my entire lived experience thus far into every meeting with me. I bring the lens of a young woman from Philadelphia who grew up in a single-parent home, who has had and continues to have many positive women in my life starting with my mother and moving from out into the circle. And the most compelling thing is that I think many times when a lot of decisions have been made about schools, about women’s bodily autonomy, about childcare and so much more, when I’m at the budget table with the governor and other leaders, I am mindful that there has never been a woman to sit at that table and fight for these things. So I am able to use my own leadership style, which sometimes entails humor, to just remind the men at the table…how serious these needs are and how we have a responsibility to move sooner [rather] than later. [Interview conducted in August 2022 while McClinton still served as House Minority Leader.]”

Joanna McClinton (d-pa)

Speaker of the State House

In the Republican Party, there’s not that many [electoral] opportunities simply given the map. I mean it’s really, really hard. …But it’s hard to get, or has been hard to get, women, much less women of color or ethnic women, to run in the Republican primary because there’s just not that many opportunities.”

Christine Radogno (r-il)

Former State Senate Minority Leader

I know that Democratic leaders especially hate to hear us say things like this, but I can’t do anything other than empower other people to see how little I can do [as a Democrat serving with a Republican supermajority]. That’s kind of the position that you’re in. [Interview conducted in February 2022 before Bell left the legislature.]”

Merleyn Bell (d-ok)

Former State Representative

I think local government is becoming more and more of an option for women in Oklahoma. …Most of the cities are nonpartisan. …I think there are people finding that maybe a state legislative race is out of reach because of the nature of the district. And so they are turning to opportunities that are more accessible maybe.”

Cindy Simon Rosenthal (np-ok)

Former Director of the Carl Albert Center and Former Mayor of Norman

Vacancies and Appointments

Maximizing structural opportunities created by elective office vacancies or appointments left to the discretion of elected political leaders requires intentionality in building a diverse bench of political women, prioritizing diversity in both the facilitators and the beneficiaries of recruitment and selection, and engaging in succession planning.

A long-held belief, including among some of our interview subjects, is that women’s political representation will increase as a result of natural evolution and officeholder turnover. In this model for progress, vacancies in elective offices create opportunities for newcomers in positions historically held by men. But as the incremental progress in women’s political representation across levels, geography, and time demonstrates, women’s ability to capitalize on vacancies is dependent on many of the structural, social, and political factors outlined in this report. Forced vacancies in the form of state legislative term limits, previously seen as a key structural opportunity for women, have had mixed results. Since implementation in multiple states, research has shown that term limits can have a negative effect on women’s political representation, especially among Republicans, if not paired by efforts to build a robust pipeline of women candidates. In our case states of Nevada and Oklahoma, women political leaders acknowledged term limits create opportunities to increase women’s political representation but also expressed frustration that term limits have forced powerful women out of office too soon. They also distinguished between representation and power, where term limits reduce power of all legislators and thus create opportunities for women’s representation as institutional power declines (see chapter one). In Illinois and Nevada, appointments to fill state legislative vacancies offer another opportunity on which women can capitalize. For example, over 75% of the Democrats appointed to the Nevada state legislature between 2010 and 2020 were women, contributing to gains that resulted in the country’s first woman-majority legislature. And across states, building women’s political power through appointed offices, especially in state executives, relies on the discretion and intention of governors — a position held by men in all of our case states.

Anytime you have a statewide election, there’s a lot of jockeying up and down the ballot for people running for Congress, people running for statewide higher office. And so all of those vacancies where we elected new women in 2017 were vacancies created when people resigned from the legislature to run for higher office.”

Melita Easters (d-ga)

Executive Director of Georgia WIN List

If we looked at the last 20, 30 years, [a contributor to the increase in women’s political representation] has really been term limits. Term limits allow for old leaders to move out and new leaders to come in. And with that has led to the significant increase and diversity in the legislature.”

Selena Torres (d-nv)

State Assemblywoman

[Term limits] also mean…when women do get to these high levels [of leadership], when someone like Barbara Buckley, who [was] the speaker of the Assembly, when someone like Maggie Carlton is chairing Ways and Means, these powerhouse women then term out and they are not there to mentor other young women.”

Yvanna Cancela (d-nv)

Former State Senator

I think [term limits are] one of the reasons why our numbers [of women] have stayed pretty stagnant over the years. Because we have had several very experienced, obviously, legislators, who are women, term out. And they’re not always replaced by women. Usually they’re not, I would say, and so I think that [term limits] definitely contributed to our relatively low rate of female [state legislative] representation in Oklahoma. …When I first was elected I thought, ‘Wow 12 years, that’s a really long time,’ but now that 12 years has come and gone it hasn’t really seemed like that long of a time. And I now feel like I’m sort of getting kicked out just when I feel like I have a really good handle on all the ins and outs of things. [Interview conducted in June 2022 before Virgin left the legislature.]”

Emily Virgin (d-ok)

Former State House Minority Leader

So specific to Illinois I will also say [that] this administration…in terms of the governor’s office and his Cabinet positions, more than 50% of the appointments are women. And that matters significantly. …The fact that this governor has surrounded himself and appointed the women…directly impacts the experience of women and families and communities, whether you are a consumer of budget items or you work for the State of Illinois.”

Sol Flores (d-il)

Former Deputy Governor

What we found is in the last appointments [to vacant seats]…that’s one way to get a minority or a woman started [in elective office]. …The easiest way to do it is through the appointment process when there’s an opening. Whether it be school board, city council, wherever, because then once they’re there, they are the incumbent. That gives them access to contacting lobbyists. That gives them access to raising money. That gives them a foot in the door, at least, [to] choose to run the next time —they have opportunity. And I think if anybody analyzed that, you’d start to see that the appointment process could be a door opening for women and minorities to get into politics.”

Chris Giunchigliani (d-nv)

Former Clark County Commissioner and Former State Assemblywoman

Changes in Electorates

Changes in electorates created by demographic change, redistricting processes, and voter mobilization or suppression efforts create opportunities and hurdles for increasing women’s political representation and power, especially at intersections of race and gender.

Demographic change within states and localities can create or limit electoral opportunities for men and women, most notably along party and racial/ethnic lines. Democratic insiders we interviewed pointed to increased racial/ethnic diversity and shifts in population from rural areas to urban centers as enhancing opportunities for Democrats, noting that Democratic opportunities are especially good for women due to women’s greater representation in the Democratic Party. Greater racial/ethnic diversity in populations also yields opportunities for women from expanding electorates, such as Asian and Latina women. But population-based opportunities can be stymied by redistricting processes, where those creating electoral maps have the power to reduce or amplify the influence of specific geographic, partisan, and racial/ethnic constituencies. For example, interview subjects in Illinois described the concerted effort by Asian American groups to keep racial/ethnic communities intact in post-2010 redistricting; in 2016, Theresa Mah (D) became the first Asian person elected to the state legislature from a district redrawn with this purpose. In contrast, advocates called out post-2020 congressional maps in Nevada for diluting the Latina/o vote. In each of our case states, redistricting processes are controlled primarily by state legislators and – in all but Pennsylvania – ultimately decided by the majority party.

One [of the contributors to gains in women’s political representation] is a demographic shift in Georgia [where] we have a lot of people who have moved into metro Atlanta. So you see the gains that women have made in the legislature [are] particularly in the metro Atlanta-area seats. And I think that’s been brought on because our metro Atlanta demographic growth is really focused, and has been, on a little bit more of a higher income and really well-educated individuals who have moved in. And I think they have found some comfort level with different voices being involved in our political sphere.”

Karen Owen (r-ga)

Founder of VoteHer Georgia

I think the biggest challenges facing Native American, Black, and Hispanic women in the state have to do with just the lack of very many opportunities [in] any districts where they can truly be competitive. And from what I’ve been following in 2020 with the new districting that’s been going on in Oklahoma right now, it’s getting worse. …There just aren’t that many opportunities at the state level for districts that would have large, active, engaged minority populations to be competitive. [Interview conducted in January 2022.]”

Cindy Simon Rosenthal (np-ok)

Former Director of the Carl Albert Center and Former Mayor of Norman

I think redistricting had a lot to do with [the influx of women running for office and winning] because when you redraw the lines over the last two times – not this last time but the two times before then – and you have those significant types of changes in districts and you have more Democratic seats available and women tend to fit into those seats a little bit better. I think that’s huge.”

Maggie Carlton (d-nv)

Former State Assemblywoman

Georgia is, what I think, at a significant demographic crossroads. Certainly, women of color are much more engaged than men of color in the state of Georgia. There [are] more Latinas registered to vote than there are Latinos. And women are engaging in ways that are substantive to help build a better community together. But I think part of the challenge is [that] we are in a system that the deck is stacked against substantial wins for our communities. We have a redistricting, gerrymandered process that packed in [and] diluted minority communities to help preserve white male dominance in the Georgia legislature.”

Jerry Gonzalez (np-ga)

Executive Director of Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials

Institutional Power Distribution

Structural power within political institutions is still disproportionately held by white men, but increased participation and success of women and actions by male allies create opportunities for structural change in access and outcomes.

The underrepresentation of women and people of color in politically-influential positions is among the barriers to increasing women’s political power cited by our interview subjects. Consistent with our discussion in chapter one, insiders note the importance of diverse representation across elected and unelected roles, as well as the differences between numerical representation and institutional power. But increased representation by women does offer opportunities for power-building, as is evident in the commentary our interview subjects provided on where and how women’s political leadership matters. While male allies are valuable in efforts to increase women’s political power, white male dominance across positions of political influence still presents hurdles to progress. White men’s particular overrepresentation among Republican political leaders and the aversion to gender-targeted solutions (see chapter three) makes it more likely that partisan disparities in gender power and representation will persist.

A lot of our local party organizations have women involved but they haven’t always promoted or encouraged women to run for a lot of those local offices. That is shifting a little bit more as we get some women in some local Republican county party organizations where they are promoting that. But historically that’s been the case. It was definitely male-dominated and thus they kind of selected their friends to run for a lot of those offices.”

Karen Owen (r-ga)

Founder of VoteHer Georgia

I would say the lobby corps that lobbies the legislature… [is] still largely dominated by white men because corporations are still dominated by white men and those lobbyists are comfortable hiring people that look like them and people that talk like them and people that act like them. …I think [it] puts our female-majority legislature in a strange spot because [women legislators] are then not taken as seriously on the policy front or they are [viewed as] too progressive because they are advocating for two weeks of paid leave instead of one or whatever it is, right? That is a real argument that we had in the legislature with a female majority saying we want paid leave, and the corporate white lobbyists are like, ‘Why?’”

Megan Jones (d-nv)

Democratic Political Consultant

I’m just still very skeptical because I look around a lot of these campaigns and I still see it filled with a lot of white men — a lot of white men’s money, a lot of white men who are consultants and candidates. And like I said, I don’t think it really changes…just organically with generations. [It does not change until] there’s a real commitment on the part of campaigns…and those who help find and recruit people to say, ‘We’re going to commit to trying to elect X number of women, period.’ …You have to be deliberate and that infrastructure needs to be built.”

Becky Carroll (d-il)

Democratic Political Consultant

I think it’s…vitally important that women are here [as political consultants]. …I ran a business with my husband and he is as feminist as could be and checks his white male privilege all the time, but he is still a white male that struggles no matter what with that internalized patriarchal point of view. And that’s why it’s so important that we’re in these positions. And so I think that it [has] improved and I think even on the Republican side, [the number of women consultants has] improved like over the last decade.”

Cassi Peters (d-ok)

Democratic Political Consultant

I think women truly need allies standing up…and being advocates. Governor Pritzker does a good job of this in lifting people up in different positions. But I think making sure more and more men, especially white men, understand that privilege and have women’s backs the way women have their backs. That’s, I think, where you’re going to see some real change. So that seems to be what’s needed most.”

Alex Sims (d-il)

Democratic Political Consultant

[Former Assembly Speakers] Jason Frierson and Steve Yeager — you have two men that recognize the importance of having strong women in those positions [of political power] and they’re not just paying lip service. They are doing it by their actions in who they’re appointing, who they are making chairs of committees, and really including that voice in the upper decision-making.”

Rochelle Nguyen (d-nv)

State Senator

So for me, I had male colleagues that were extremely supportive of women running [for political office]. So one of the people that was instrumental in my success after the primary and the runoff was Representative Marcus McIntyre. And he was just always very vocal about the fact that women bring a different perspective to the capitol, they bring a more holistic view than men. And so for me it was very much the fact that I had males who were encouraging people to vote for women.”

Jessica Garvin (r-ok)

State Senator

I don’t want to set anything backwards or make it sound bad. But women aren’t going to solve this problem by themselves. They need all the folks who are in the establishment who are kind of the old white men, [they] have to welcome them in and bring them in and find opportunities. Because if not, it’s hard to do yourself if you’re on the outside. It’s hard to get on the inside.”

Ray Zaborney (r-pa)

Republican Political Consultant

Prescriptions for Addressing Structural Barriers and Opportunities

Invest in diverse and innovative approaches to closing the finance gaps that affect who can run for, win, or serve in elective office.

Existing efforts to provide targeted campaign funds to women through dedicated political action committees can be expanded in reach, level of investment, timing of investment (to allow for support at the earliest stages of campaigns), and attentiveness to systemic biases (e.g. perceptions of electability, smaller donations) that affect women of color, working-class women, and young women. But, as noted in chapter three, focusing solely on targeted women’s PACs is insufficient to address the diverse financial challenges that women confront from candidate emergence to officeholding. Addressing the personal and professional financial costs of campaigning and officeholding requires promoting efforts to: expand permissions to use campaign funds to cover personal costs, as has been evident in state rule changes to allow campaign funds to be used for childcare and federal-level advocacy to allow campaign fund coverage of rent and lost income while campaigning; increase compensation for officeholding; and/or identify and apply best practices for employers to promote compatibility of public service with non-elective employment (e.g. protected and/or paid leaves, reduced/flexible work hours). Limiting the role of money in campaigns through significant campaign finance reform might also be particularly beneficial to women, though its impact would be much more widespread and enactment difficult based on judicial precedent. Likewise, public financing for campaigns can create opportunity but not necessarily equity unless all candidates are required to opt in. Assuming campaign costs remain high, women candidates would benefit from access to expanded pools of donors, including women donors who are especially likely to give to women candidates. 

Provide compensation and benefits to campaign and legislative staff that promote feasibility and retention.

Compensation for full-time campaign and legislative staff varies widely across campaigns and institutions, with much discretion given to the political principal (candidate or officeholder). In many cases, time demands and workload are not commensurate with compensation, hampering both recruitment and retention. And the opportunity costs of taking on this work – whereby staffers could earn more outside of these roles – are especially influential to those individuals without access to wealth and/or alternative income. Increased efforts to unionize campaigns and legislative staff, as well as to promote standardized compensation and benefits across campaign and legislative operations, including efforts to better address concentrated workloads and irregular hours, offer an opportunity to create more accessible and attractive conditions for all potential staff, including women.

Promote more family-friendly political institutions.

Research and strategic planning to create “gender-sensitive parliaments” have burgeoned in the past 15 years, from the ongoing global initiative of the Inter-Parliamentary Union to more country-specific efforts like those in the United Kingdom and Australia. Suggested reforms encompass both structural and cultural interventions, as well as attentiveness not only to women-friendly but also diversity-sensitive efforts. Moreover, these blueprints grapple with the unique dynamics of elected bodies that make certain flexible labor practices – such as leave, work share, or even remote work – more difficult. While not directly applicable to U.S. institutions, this work offers avenues for further exploration and application in the U.S. context. In the United States, recent efforts by the House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress and the Congressional Reform Task Force provide additional prescriptions for increasing staff diversity and retention, creating more accessible pathways to congressional service, and addressing hurdles to service created by congressional operations. Specific concerns raised by our interview subjects about the lack of institution-provided childcare, lactation spaces, and leave policies might be addressed by existing reform suggestions to create friendlier environments for officeholders and staff alike.

Similar challenges, albeit distinct due to the nature and timeline of the work, exist on political campaigns. While less research has been done to identify both challenges and reform opportunities to create more gender-sensitive, inclusive, and family-friendly campaigns, the unionization efforts mentioned above – spearheaded by groups like the Campaign Workers Guild – offer one avenue toward addressing some of the barriers raised specifically by campaign practitioners.

Build political pipelines and engage in strategic planning and prioritization to capitalize on opportunities created by vacancies, demographic change, and appointed positions.

Continued efforts are necessary to ensure that when structural opportunities to increase women’s political power are identified and created, there are political women ready, willing, and able to take advantage of them. This work is already being done, as outlined in chapter three, but can be expanded, improved, more coordinated, and better-resourced. It can also be more strategic, leveraging advanced knowledge of vacancies and retirements, recognition of demographic change, and formal processes for appointments (both to elective office and high-level government posts) to pair prospective women political leaders with opportunities best fit to their circumstances.